Atomization characteristics of multi-type aerial nozzles in wind tunnel and low airflow velocity condition in manned agricultural helicopter

Weixiang Yao, Yubin Lan, Wesley Clint Hoffmann, Shuang Guo, Shengde Chen, Sheng Wen, Wen Zeng, Zhihong Li, Xiaowen Liang

Abstract


In order to explore the atomization characteristics of the LICHENG series nozzle for manned agricultural helicopter under medium and low airflow velocity conditions, droplet size tests on five sizes of nozzles 11002, 11003, 11004, 11006 and 11010 were carried out by laser diffraction device (LDD), based on the high-low speed composite wind tunnel for agricultural aviation designed by the National Center for International Collaboration Research on Precision Agricultural Aviation Pesticides Spraying Technology (NPAAC) of South China Agricultural University (SCAU).  The results showed that under the three spray pressures of 30, 40 and 50 psi, the droplet sizes of the five types of nozzles expressed similar trends with the increase of airflow velocity.  Among them, the droplet size variation of nozzles 11006 and 11010 with larger orifice size was the most significant, the largest range of DV0.1 was nozzle 11010, and the largest range of DV0.5 and DV0.9 was nozzle 11006.  In addition, the changes of spray pressure would directly affect the quality of spray, especially the nozzles 11002, 11003 and 11004 with small orifice sizes were significantly affected.  Under the condition of medium and low airflow velocity of 0-27.8 m/s, 89% of spread value (SV) by the five nozzles were in the range of less than 15%, but there were some test nozzles with poor spray stability during the test, which made the measurements of droplet size value larger, resulting in a maximum test deviation of up to 210.9 μm.  The result also exposed the limitations exist in wind tunnel droplet size testing by using LDD, and an increase in airflow velocity resulted in a larger measurement droplet size.  This phenomenon was particularly significant in the DV0.5 test results of various types of nozzles.  This study can provide experimental data guidance for the optimization design and parameter selection of aerial nozzle for manned agricultural helicopter.

Keywords: manned helicopter, aerial nozzle, wind tunnel, droplet size, agricultural application, spray classification

DOI: 10.33440/j.ijpaa.20190201.0031

 

Citation:Yao W X, Lan Y B, Hoffmann W C, Guo S, Chen S D, Wen S, et al.  Atomization characteristics of multi-type aerial nozzles in wind tunnel and low airflow velocity condition in manned agricultural helicopter.  Int J Precis Agric Aviat, 2019; 2(1): 9–17.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Lan Y B, Chen S D, Fritz B K. Current status and future trends of precision agricultural aviation technologies. International Journal of Agricultural & Biological Engineering, 2017; 10(3): 1–17. doi: 10.3965/j.ijabe.20171003.3088.

Antuniassi U R, Motta A A B, Chechetto R G, et al. Spray drift from aerial application. Aspects of Applied Biology, 2014; (122): 279–284.

Yao W X, Lan Y B, Wang J, et al. Droplet drift characteristics of aerial spraying of AS350B3e helicopter. Transactions of the CSAE, 2017; 33(22): 75–83. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.22.010. (in Chinese)

Hilz E, Vermeer A W P. Spray drift review: The extent to which a formulation can contribute to spray drift reduction. Crop Protection, 2013; 44(1): 75–83. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2012.10.020.

Sudheer K P, Panda R K. Digital image processing for determining drop sizes from irrigation spray nozzles. Agricultural Water Management, 2000; 45(2): 159–167. doi:10.1016/S0378-3774(99)00079-7.

Dorr G, Hanan J, Adkins S, et al. Spray deposition on plant surfaces: a modelling approach. Functional Plant Biology, 2008; 35(2): 988–996. doi: 10.1071/FP08056.

Hewitt A J. Droplet size spectra classification categories in aerial application scenarios. Crop Protection, 2008; 27(9): 1284–1288. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2008.03.010.

Yao W X, Wang X J, Lan Y B, et al. Effect of UAV prewetting application during the flowering period of cotton on pesticide droplet deposition. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2018, 5(4): 455–461. doi: 10.15302/J-FASE-2018232.

Chanetz B. A century of wind tunnels since Eiffel. Comptes Rendus Mécanique, 2017; 345(8), 581–594. doi: 10.1016/j.crme.2017.05.012.

Guler H, Zhu H P, Ozkan H E, et al. Spray characteristics and drift reduction potential with air induction and conventional flat-fan nozzles. Transactions of the ASABE, 2007; 50(3): 745–754. doi: 10.13031/2013. 23129.

Kirk I W. Measurement and prediction of atomization parameters from fixed-wing aircraft spray nozzles. Transactions of the ASABE, 2007; 50(3), 693–703. doi: 10.13031/2013.23123.

Hoffmann W C, Hewitt A J, Ross J B, et al. Spray adjuvant effects on droplet size spectra measured by three laser-based systems in a high-speed wind tunnel. Journal of ASTM International, 2008; 5(6): 1–12. doi: 10.1520/STP46608S.

Fritz B K, Hoffmann W C. Update to the USDA-ARS fixed-wind spray nozzle models. Transactions of the ASABE, 2015; 58(2): 281–295. doi: 10.13031/trans.58.10896.

Fritz B K, Hoffmann W C, Kruger G R, et al. Comparison of drop size data from ground and aerial application nozzles at three testing laboratories. Atomization and sprays 2014; 24(2): 181–192. doi: 10.1615/AtomizSpr. 2013009668.

Lan Y B, Chen S D. Current status and trends of plant protection UAV and its spraying technology in China. International Journal of Precision Agricultural Aviation, 2018; 1(1): 1–9. doi: 10.33440/j.ijpaa.20180101. 0002.

Yao W X, Lan Y B, Wen S, et al. Evaluation of droplet deposition and effect of variable-rate application by a manned helicopter with AG-NAV Guía system. International Journal of Agricultural & Biological Engineering, 2019; 12(1): 172–178. doi: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20191201.4039.

Zhang D Y, Chen L P, Zhang R R, et al. Evaluating effective swath width and droplet distribution of aerial spraying systems on M-18B and Thrush 510G airplanes. International Journal of Agricultural & Biological Engineering, 2015; 8(2): 21–30. doi: 10.3965/j.ijabe.20150802.1493.

Li J Y, Shi Y Y, Lan Y B, et al. Vertical distribution and vortex structure of rotor wind field under the influence of rice canopy. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2019; (159): 140–146. doi: 10.1016/j.compag. 2019.02.027.

Liu H S, Lan Y B, Xue X Y, et al. Development of wind tunnel test technologies in agricultural aviation spraying. Transactions of the CSAE, 2015; 31(Supp.2): 1–10. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.z2.001. (in Chinese)

Wang X N, He X K, Song J L, et al. Effect of adjuvant types and concentration on spray drift potential of different nozzles. Transactions of the CSAE, 2015; 31(22): 49–55. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015. 22.007. (in Chinese)

Zhang R R, Li L L, Fu W, et al. Spraying atomization performance by pulse width modulated variable and droplet deposition characteristics in wind tunnel. Transactions of the CSAE, 2019; 35(3): 42–51. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.03.006. (in Chinese)

Zhang H C, Dorr G, Zheng J Q, et al. Wind tunnel experiment of influence on droplet size distribution of flat fan nozzles. Transactions of the CSAM, 2012; 43(6): 53–57+52. doi:10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2012. 06.010. (in Chinese)

Tang Q, Chen L P, Zhang R R, et al. Atomization characteristics of normal flat fan nozzle and air induction nozzle under high speed airflow conditions. Transactions of the CSAE, 2016, 32(22): 121–128. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.22.017. (in Chinese)

Ru Y, Zhu C Y, Bao R, et al. Droplet size distribution of aerial nozzle for plant protection in wind tunnel and flight conditions. Transactions of the CSAE, 2016; 32(20): 94–98. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.20.012. (in Chinese)

ISO Standards, 22856: Equipment for crop protection-Methods for the laboratory measurement of spray drift-Wind tunnels, Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2008.

Fritz B K, Hoffmann W C. Establishing reference nozzles for classification of aerial application spray technologies. International Journal of Precision Agricultural Aviation, 2018; 1(1): 10–14. doi: 10.33440/j.ijpaa.20180101.0003.

ASAE Standards, S672.2: Spray nozzle classification by droplet spectra, St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2018.

Dodge L G, Rhodes D J, Reitz R D. Drop-size measurement techniques for sprays: comparison of malvern laser-diffraction and aerometrics phase/doppler. Applied Optics, 1987; 26(11): 2144–2154. doi: 10.1364/ AO.26.002144.

Hoffmann W C, Fritz B K, Lan Y B. Using laser diffraction to measure agricultural sprays: common sources of error when making measurements. International Journal of Precision Agricultural Aviation, 2018; 1(1): 15–18. doi: 10.33440/j.ijpaa.20180101.0005.

Fritz B K, Hoffmann W C, Bagley W E, et al. Measuring droplet size of agricultural spray nozzles-measurement distance and airspeed effects. Atomization and sprays, 2014; 24(9): 747–760. doi: 10.1615/AtomizSpr. 2014008424.

Womac A R. Quality Control of Standardized Reference Spray Nozzles. Transactions of the ASAE, 2000; 43(1): 47–56. doi: 10.13031/2013.2686.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.